Cases Using CodeSuite

CodeSuite has become a de facto standard for litigation involving software IP theft and infringement. Here are just a few cases where CodeSuite has been used.

SplitFish v. Bannco

Case: l:10cv297
Court: U.S. District Court, Northern Easter District of Virginia, Alexandria Division

• Preliminary injunction against defendant granted.
• Alleged copying of firmware for video game controllers.
• Compared source code using BitMatch.
• Evidence presented in a declaration.
  

Minden Schipper & Associates v. Cancercare Manitoba (Varian Medical Systems)

Case: CI 05-01-45377
Court: Queen's Bench, Winnipeg Centre, Canada

• Case was settled.
• Alleged copying of oncology diagnosis expert system software.
• Compared source code using CodeMatch.
• Evidence presented in an expert report.
  

Facebook v. StudiVZ

Case: 5:08-CV-03468 JF
Court: United States District Court, Northern District of California

• Case was settled.
• Alleged copyright infringement case involving web-based social networking software.
• Compared source code using CodeMatch.
  

The MathWorks, Inc. v. COMSOL AB and COMSOL, Inc.

Case: 6:06-CV-335
Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas - Tyler Division

• Case was settled.
• Alleged copyright infringement case involving mathematical modeling software.
• Compared source code using CodeMatch.
  

Symantec v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case number: 12075-06
Court: US Tax Court of California

• Software tax dispute
• Software comparison using CodeDiff.
• Evidence presented in an expert report and at trial.

Iconix v. netPickle, et al.

Case number: 4:06-cv-02201
Court: U.S. District Court, Northern District of California

• Copyright infringement case involving web-based presentation software.
• CodeDiff used to compare source code.
• Evidence presented in an expert report and at deposition.

Rasterex Holdings v. Research in Motion

Case number: 2003-cv-76785
Court: Superior Court of Fulton County, State of Georgia

• Copyright infringement case involving mobile document translation and storage software.
• CodeMatch used to compare source code.
• Evidence presented in an expert report and at deposition.

Moneygram Payment Systems v. Enterprise Payment Solutions

Case number: 1:05-cv-00172
Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

• Copyright infringement case involving ACH financial software.
• CodeMatch used to compare source code.
• Evidence presented in an expert report.
  

Agere Systems, Inc. v. Intersil Corporation

Case number: 02-CV-08219, 02-CV-1544
Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania

• Copyright infringement and contract dispute involving WLAN chips.
• CodeMatch used to compare firmware source code.
• Evidence presented in an expert report and rebuttal to opposition expert report.