<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Software Analysis and Forensic Engineering &#187; object code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/tag/object-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog</link>
	<description>Software IP Blog from SAFE Corporation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:10:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Software IP Detective&#8217;s Handbook</title>
		<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2011/05/02/the-software-ip-detectives-handbook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2011/05/02/the-software-ip-detectives-handbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 14:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Zeidman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensic engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lines of code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plagiarism detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reverse engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transfer pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My book on software intellectual property has just been published by Prentice-Hall.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My book on software intellectual property, a labor of love (and hate) for the last two years, has just been published by Prentice-Hall. The book is intended for several different audiences including computer scientists, computer programmers, business managers, lawyers, engineering consultants, expert witnesses, and high-tech entrepreneurs. Some chapters give easy-to-understand explanations of intellectual property concepts including copyrights, patents, and trade secrets. Other chapters are highly mathematical treatments describing quantitative ways of comparing and measuring software and software IP. The first chapter of the book outlines which chapters are most important for the different audiences.</p>
<p>Overall the book covers the following topics:</p>
<ul>
<li>Key concepts of software intellectual property</li>
<li>Comparing and correlating source code for signs of theft or infringement</li>
<li>Uncovering signs of copying in object code when source code is inaccessible</li>
<li>Tracking malware and third-party code in applications</li>
<li>Using software clean rooms to avoid IP infringement</li>
<li>Understanding IP issues associated with patents, open source, and DMCA</li>
</ul>
<p>You can purchase your copy from Amazon.com <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0137035330/ref=as_li_tf_til?tag=zeidmanconsultin&amp;camp=14573&amp;creative=327641&amp;linkCode=as1&amp;creativeASIN=0137035330&amp;adid=18P9PSPJ8KM2S9C43FC9&amp;" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2011/05/02/the-software-ip-detectives-handbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SAFE introduces CodeSuite-LT</title>
		<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2011/01/02/safe-introduces-codesuite-lt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2011/01/02/safe-introduces-codesuite-lt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 03:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Zeidman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensic engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reverse engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret theft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes a full-course meal is more than you need, have time for, or are willing to pay for. Sometimes fast food just hits the spot. That's why we're introducing CodeSuite-LT, a lower priced version of CodeSuite with most of the functionality at much lower cost. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CodeSuite-LT® is a less expensive, limited version of the full CodeSuite tool. Each tool in the suite produces a readable report that can be used to find copying. CodeSuite-LT includes BitMatch, CodeCross, CodeDiff, CodeMatch, FileCount, and FileIsolate. It also includes the ability to filter results using SourceDetective. CodeSuite-LT does not produce a database and does not allow post-process filtering of results. Instead, it generates an easy-to-read report that can be used to pinpoint copying.</p>
<p><strong>Which is Right For You?</strong></p>
<p>Which product is right for you, CodeSuite or CodeSuite-LT? Click <a title="CodeSuite comparison" href="http://www.SAFE-corp.biz/products_codesuite_comparison.htm" target="_blank">here </a>for a table that compares the features of both programs so you can choose the right solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2011/01/02/safe-introduces-codesuite-lt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting software IP cases of 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2010/01/01/interesting-software-ip-cases-of-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2010/01/01/interesting-software-ip-cases-of-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Zeidman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensic engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reverse engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret theft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were a number of large lawsuits involving software IP in 2009. We know that CodeSuite was used in many of them (because of protective orders, we don't know all the cases where CodeSuite was used).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my list of the most interesting software IP cases of 2009,<br />
in chronological order:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.boston.com/business/ticker/2009/02/ca_and_rocket_s.html" target="_blank">CA and Rocket Software reach settlement</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.smartcompany.com.au/Free-Articles/The-Briefing/20090213-Facebook-founder-paid-100-million-to-settle-theft-claims.html" target="_blank">Facebook founder paid $100 million to settle theft claims</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/022309-fired-workers-steal-data.html" target="_blank">More than half of booted workers steal data on way out, survey finds</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9132585/Swedish_man_indicted_in_2004_Cisco_code_theft" target="_blank">Swedish man indicted in 2004 Cisco code theft</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.computerworld.com/cisco_makes_peace_with_free_software_foundation" target="_blank">Cisco makes peace with Free Software Foundation</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/16/facebook-loses-lawsuit-against-german-clone-studivz/" target="_blank">Facebook loses lawsuit against German clone StudiVZ</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.newsfactor.com/news/China-Down-on-Blocking-Software/story.xhtml?story_id=101009A6LNWO" target="_blank">China backs down on installing blocking software</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.qj.net/psp/news/iphone-game-accused-of-plagiarizing-flow.html" target="_blank">iPhone game accused of plagiarizing flOw</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.itnews.com.au/News/149473,programmer-accused-of-stealing-goldman-sachs-source-code.aspx" target="_blank">Programmer accused of stealing Goldman Sachs source code</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.finextra.com/fullstory.asp?id=20263" target="_blank">UBS files code theft lawsuit</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=118326&amp;concurrency_check=false" target="_blank">10th Circuit strips Novell of Unix copyright</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aHuC3.K7Dclo" target="_blank">Skype&#8217;s founders sue EBay over copyright infringement</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2009/10/23/stoneloops-jurassica-pulled-app-store-due-copyright-complaint/" target="_blank">StoneLoops! of Jurassica pulled from App Store due to copyright complaint?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2009/11/06/microsoft-lifts-gpl-code-uses-in-microsoft-store-tool/" target="_blank">Microsoft lifts GPL code, uses in Microsoft Store tool</a></li>
<li><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10397876-37.html" target="_blank">Judge rules for Apple in Psystar case</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.precentral.net/copyright-infringement-lawsuit-filed-against-palm" target="_blank">Copyright infringement lawsuit filed against Palm </a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/symantec-wins-545-million-opinion-in-tax-case-2009-12-10" target="_blank">Symantec wins $545 million decision in federal tax case</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2357122,00.asp" target="_blank">Best Buy, JVC, Samsung, more hit with lawsuit</a></li>
<li><a href="http://windowsitpro.com/windowspaulthurrott/article/articleid/103305/microsoft-joint-venture-in-china-plagiarizes-competitor.html" target="_blank">Microsoft joint venture in China plagiarizes competitor</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Data-Storage/Seagate-Misappropriated-Convolve-Technology-Says-ExEmployee-569615/" target="_blank">Seagate misappropriated Convolve technology, says ex-employee</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2010/01/01/interesting-software-ip-cases-of-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SAFE Corporation is looking for great ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2009/12/02/safe-corporation-is-looking-for-great-ideas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2009/12/02/safe-corporation-is-looking-for-great-ideas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Zeidman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensic engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lines of code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reverse engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secret theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have a research idea relating to code analysis, and you can use the SAFE tools, let us know. If your proposal passes our review process you'll get free licenses to our tools, free support, and help getting your results published.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of unanswered questions about source code, and we want to work with you to figure them out. We realize that currently accepted algorithms for analyzing, comparing, and measuring source code leave a lot to be desired in many cases. Also, there are a lot of techniques that have never been studied on large bodies of modern code. For example, measurement techniques developed in the 1970s were probably tested on assembly languages and older programming languages like BASIC, FORTRAN, and COBOL. Do they still hold on modern object oriented languages like Java and C#?</p>
<p>If you have a research idea relating to code analysis, and you can use the SAFE tools, let us know. Email <a href="mailto:larry@SAFE-corp.biz">Larry Melling</a>, VP of Sales and Marketing with your ideas. If they pass our review process you&#8217;ll get free licenses to our tools, free support, and help getting your results published. This could be the beginning of a beautiful friendship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2009/12/02/safe-corporation-is-looking-for-great-ideas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key points about software copyrights</title>
		<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2009/08/01/key-points-about-software-copyrights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2009/08/01/key-points-about-software-copyrights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Zeidman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, a copyright exists at the moment of creation. In other words, a work does not need to be published to have a copyright. The copyright does not need to be registered with the U.S. Copyright office. It is simply a right given to the person who created the work. The advantage of registering a copyright with the government is that you then have an official document proving your ownership, making it easier to win in court against someone who attempts to use your creation without your permission.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, a copyright exists at the moment of creation. In other words, a work does not need to be published to have a copyright. The copyright does not need to be registered with the U.S. Copyright office. It is simply a right given to the person who created the work. The advantage of registering a copyright with the government is that you then have an official document proving your ownership, making it easier to win in court against someone who attempts to use your creation without your permission. Registration can be done any time after the work is created, but is required in order to initiate litigation. Winning a copyright infringement case in court, when the copyright is registered before the infringement took place or within 3 months of the publication of the work, can entitle you to get back your attorney fees as well as &#8220;statutory damages,&#8221; which essentially constitute financial punishment that is not based on the amount of money lost by the author due to the infringement. This is done to encourage people to register their copyrights and to deter people from stealing them.</p>
<p>As the owner of a copyright, you have the right to reproduce the work, enhance the work, distribute the work, and perform it or display it in public.</p>
<p>With software, the copyright gives protection to the source code and the binary code generated from the source code. In order to register a copyright, it is normally necessary to file a copy of the intellectual property being protected with the US Copyright Office as proof. Since most software contains valuable trade secrets (which we discuss in a later section) that would lose their value if presented to the public, the copyright office allows software source code to be submitted with major sections &#8220;redacted&#8221; or left out. In fact, only the first 25 and last 25 printed pages of source code need to be submitted, though there are no guidelines as to what constitutes &#8220;first&#8221; and &#8220;last&#8221; in something consisting of many independent files and a complex interconnect of routines.</p>
<p>Note that a copyright notice is not required in the code, except for registering the copyright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2009/08/01/key-points-about-software-copyrights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

