<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Software Analysis and Forensic Engineering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog</link>
	<description>Software IP Blog from SAFE Corporation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:36:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Congress Break the Internet? A look at SOPA and PIPA. by Elsa</title>
		<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2012/01/29/will-congress-break-the-internet-a-look-at-sopa-and-pipa/comment-page-1/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Elsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/?p=311#comment-572</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m relieved to read you! I do agree with you but I don&#039;t stop to hear the opposite speech. Also, I was wondering why everyone was protesting against PIPA and SOPA whereas i thought this two bills aim to protect efficiently the IP right holders...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m relieved to read you! I do agree with you but I don&#8217;t stop to hear the opposite speech. Also, I was wondering why everyone was protesting against PIPA and SOPA whereas i thought this two bills aim to protect efficiently the IP right holders&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Congress Break the Internet? A look at SOPA and PIPA. by Muvaffak GOZAYDIN</title>
		<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2012/01/29/will-congress-break-the-internet-a-look-at-sopa-and-pipa/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>Muvaffak GOZAYDIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/?p=311#comment-567</guid>
		<description>Everybody agree that internet is uncontrollable for time being. Therefore there are many many illigal actiivities + harmful websites are around. It makes dangerous for particularly children to access.
But law must be designed so carefully that it should not harm the decent information flow .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody agree that internet is uncontrollable for time being. Therefore there are many many illigal actiivities + harmful websites are around. It makes dangerous for particularly children to access.<br />
But law must be designed so carefully that it should not harm the decent information flow .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who really invented the computer? by Stan Sieler</title>
		<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2010/02/02/who-really-invented-the-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Sieler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/?p=111#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Re: &quot;. If a case with this much at stake could not convince a judge after seven months, then there is little hope for any IP case.&quot;

You&#039;re right ... there is little hope for any IP case.  I learned that some years ago, as a an expert witness in a number of cases, both in the U.S.A. and Canada.  Part of the reason is that nothing in real life is &quot;binary&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: &#8220;. If a case with this much at stake could not convince a judge after seven months, then there is little hope for any IP case.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right &#8230; there is little hope for any IP case.  I learned that some years ago, as a an expert witness in a number of cases, both in the U.S.A. and Canada.  Part of the reason is that nothing in real life is &#8220;binary&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who really invented the computer? by zeidman</title>
		<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2010/02/02/who-really-invented-the-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>zeidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 07:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/?p=111#comment-564</guid>
		<description>Herbert, ENIAC was also hardwired to do calculations. By your definition, the EDSAC in Cambridge was the first computer in 1949. However, that&#039;s not the definition that computer scientists or historians use for &quot;computer,&quot; but rather that&#039;s the definition of &quot;stored program computer.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herbert, ENIAC was also hardwired to do calculations. By your definition, the EDSAC in Cambridge was the first computer in 1949. However, that&#8217;s not the definition that computer scientists or historians use for &#8220;computer,&#8221; but rather that&#8217;s the definition of &#8220;stored program computer.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who really invented the computer? by Herbert Kanner</title>
		<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2010/02/02/who-really-invented-the-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Herbert Kanner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 07:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/?p=111#comment-563</guid>
		<description>Very simply: if it is not programmable, it&#039;s not a computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very simply: if it is not programmable, it&#8217;s not a computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Googling replacing programming? by Software Analysis and Forensic Engineering &#187; Inventions must be novel and nonobvious, not complex</title>
		<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2011/03/05/is-googling-replacing-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Software Analysis and Forensic Engineering &#187; Inventions must be novel and nonobvious, not complex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 19:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/?p=191#comment-535</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Googling replacing programming? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Googling replacing programming? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grocery trolls and civil liberties by zeidman</title>
		<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2011/09/02/grocery-trolls-and-civil-liberties/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>zeidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/?p=272#comment-534</guid>
		<description>Hi Genevieve. I definitely believe in transparent markets and competition, so any other means for selling or licensing patents seems good to me, even if it cuts out the middleman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Genevieve. I definitely believe in transparent markets and competition, so any other means for selling or licensing patents seems good to me, even if it cuts out the middleman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grocery trolls and civil liberties by Genevieve</title>
		<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2011/09/02/grocery-trolls-and-civil-liberties/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Genevieve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 05:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/?p=272#comment-533</guid>
		<description>&quot;That’s why restrictions on the sale of patents must never be allowed in any free market economy&quot; - 

I do agree Bob, and NPE are playing a role as broker in a non-transparent market. But what about the opportunity for all my grocery producers to upload their production online transparently and sell directly to the consumer? (Community supported Agriculture does already use this model from producer to consumer. ) Grocery Trolls such as Safeway or Walmart for sure provide a wider channel for commerce but do they promote the best quality product for the end-user?

In a similar way, Patent Trolls provide professional channel handling and patent-related transaction but do they encourage the usage of top innovation when they sue for infringement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That’s why restrictions on the sale of patents must never be allowed in any free market economy&#8221; &#8211; </p>
<p>I do agree Bob, and NPE are playing a role as broker in a non-transparent market. But what about the opportunity for all my grocery producers to upload their production online transparently and sell directly to the consumer? (Community supported Agriculture does already use this model from producer to consumer. ) Grocery Trolls such as Safeway or Walmart for sure provide a wider channel for commerce but do they promote the best quality product for the end-user?</p>
<p>In a similar way, Patent Trolls provide professional channel handling and patent-related transaction but do they encourage the usage of top innovation when they sue for infringement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why da Vinci was not an engineer, scientist, or mathematician by John Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2011/07/31/why-da-vinci-was-not-an-engineer-scientist-or-mathematician/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>John Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 06:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/?p=244#comment-524</guid>
		<description>This article is so true it&#039;s not even funny.  Read da Vinci&#039;s notebooks for an idea of his true analytical abilities, as they are in fact quite funny, being totally absurd for the most part.  For example, he thought that vision involved the departure of the eyeballs from the skull, upon which they would travel across space, touch the object to be viewed, the return to the skull and transfer visual information to the mind.  After reading those notebooks, you&#039;d swear that the guy was a retard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is so true it&#8217;s not even funny.  Read da Vinci&#8217;s notebooks for an idea of his true analytical abilities, as they are in fact quite funny, being totally absurd for the most part.  For example, he thought that vision involved the departure of the eyeballs from the skull, upon which they would travel across space, touch the object to be viewed, the return to the skull and transfer visual information to the mind.  After reading those notebooks, you&#8217;d swear that the guy was a retard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DocMatch detects plagiarism by Latest software for plagiarism news &#8211; Fighting Global Diversity &#8211; The Evolution of Plagiarism Software &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/2011/04/04/docmatch-detects-plagiarism/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest software for plagiarism news &#8211; Fighting Global Diversity &#8211; The Evolution of Plagiarism Software &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 04:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safe-corp.biz/blog/?p=198#comment-474</guid>
		<description>[...] Software Analysis and Forensic Engineering &#187; DocMatch detects &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Software Analysis and Forensic Engineering &#187; DocMatch detects &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

