Comments for Software Analysis and Forensic Engineering

Comment on Why da Vinci was not an engineer, scientist, or mathematician by mE

mE — Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:36:24 +0000

Omg! Finally, someone says it!

Comment on Why da Vinci was not an engineer, scientist, or mathematician by mE

mE — Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:35:34 +0000

Omg! Finally, someone gets it!

Comment on Why da Vinci was not an engineer, scientist, or mathematician by Dr. Bob

Dr. Bob — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 22:48:22 +0000

Spot on. For years I’ve been making the DaVinci case but to no avail. People who do not design, engineer, and manufacture too easily view a pretty picture or lofty claim as evidence of reality. Too often great businessmen and magnificent self promoters (Steve Jobs, Dean Kamen) pitch themselves as creators but, in fact, are very good at monetizing the ideas of others. That’s fine. They should just give credit and take credit for having the insight to know a good idea when put in front of them. As for myself, I developed anti-gravity decades ago and documented it with sketches of floating containers. The well sedated were impressed but, like the DaVinci helicopter (air screw), I have been unable to get my idea off real ground. Probably just some technical issue.

Comment on Job Opening: Software Forensic Engineer by Kelly Williams

Kelly Williams — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 20:46:03 +0000

Forensic engineering incorporate forensic investigation for the physical factors behind the incidents with some other reasons for lawsuits. Those who are behind this are the forensic engineers who can be named on to perform research and also discover the reasons of accidents.

Comment on Why da Vinci was not an engineer, scientist, or mathematician by roshan shanbhag

roshan shanbhag — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 01:32:32 +0000

This is a good article. I never understood why da Vinci was so revered as a Mathematician / Engineer either. He was a good artist…all these other glorifying attributes of him being a scientist/ mathematician/ engineer etc… seems like somebody tried very hard to potray him as a man who knew it all.

Comment on Why da Vinci was not an engineer, scientist, or mathematician by Sean Morley

Sean Morley — Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:57:11 +0000

Thank you for the revelation! Given the information you present, I totally agree with you. I am tempted to relate da Vinci to Steve Jobs, who seemed to get full credit for developing Apple products. But Jobs had the technical chops to work with the actual developers.

Comment on Inventions must be novel and nonobvious, not complex by Jackie Kushner

Jackie Kushner — Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:50:22 +0000

This did not help me @ all with my report of Ferensic’s

Comment on Will Congress Break the Internet? A look at SOPA and PIPA. by Elsa

Elsa — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:36:41 +0000

I’m relieved to read you! I do agree with you but I don’t stop to hear the opposite speech. Also, I was wondering why everyone was protesting against PIPA and SOPA whereas i thought this two bills aim to protect efficiently the IP right holders…

Comment on Will Congress Break the Internet? A look at SOPA and PIPA. by Muvaffak GOZAYDIN

Muvaffak GOZAYDIN — Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:49:57 +0000

Everybody agree that internet is uncontrollable for time being. Therefore there are many many illigal actiivities + harmful websites are around. It makes dangerous for particularly children to access.
But law must be designed so carefully that it should not harm the decent information flow .

Comment on Who really invented the computer? by Stan Sieler

Stan Sieler — Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:34:26 +0000

Re: “. If a case with this much at stake could not convince a judge after seven months, then there is little hope for any IP case.”

You’re right … there is little hope for any IP case. I learned that some years ago, as a an expert witness in a number of cases, both in the U.S.A. and Canada. Part of the reason is that nothing in real life is “binary”.